Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On January 13, 2017, at around 09:00, the Defendant had the victim D’s house located in the Seo-gu Incheon Building C, Seo-gu Incheon, Incheon, and had E, F, etc., and had a horse dispute with the victim, and “the Defendant raising the victim with the same fluor of gent Paris from Abain,”

of this chapter, the Corporation shall hold the

Degressorus:

The Mesty of this Mespule was the Mespulty.

Summary of Evidence

1. Recording of witness F and D respective statements in the second public trial records;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. The current status, recording (G, F) [the defendant did not have any desire to commit the crime, and F did not have any desire to commit the crime, so the victim and F did not have credibility because the victim and F did not have any intent to commit the crime at the time. However, considering the following circumstances, the victim and F’s statement is credibility and thus, the defendant’s statement may be acknowledged as being the same as the facts charged.

① The police confirmed on January 13, 2017 that the day of taking pictures of the victim’s house stored in the F’s cell phone during the investigation process was the day of taking pictures of the victim’s cell phone.

② As to the process during which the dispute between the Defendant and the victim occurred in the court, F made a false statement as to the process of the dispute between the Defendant and the victim’s “at the time when the victim made a false statement,” which is disadvantageous to the victim as well as the date when the victim was made disadvantageous to the victim,” which indicates his/her subjective perception and evaluation as to the witness. As such, F made a false statement as he/she had experienced from the victim.

It is difficult to see.

③ Because of any point in the investigation process, F explained how the Defendant and the victimized person are memoryed at the time of the investigation, and stated their impression and perception about the witness.

In light of these statements, it is difficult for F to dismiss credibility on the grounds that F is a business partner of an enterprise related to the victim.

4. In this Court, the injured party is receiving a complaint from the Defendant, and “I will complete the correct match.”