The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not catch or spabbbling the victim’s spath, and rather, the victim was faced with the victim’s spabling during the process of turning the Defendant’s spabling.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty is erroneous by mistake.

2. The judgment of the court below revealed the following circumstances based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, namely, ① the contents of each statement made by E and F at the time of the victim and E and E in the office of South-North Eup, who had been present at the scene, coincide with each other, there are no circumstances contrary to mutual contradiction or rule of experience; ② E and F have no particular interest in the fact that they had not been present at the scene; ② E and F have the motive to make a statement disadvantageous to the defendant; and each of them has the physical strength so far as they could not make a statement because they did not actually have been present; ③ The defendant asserts that the victim rather expressed that he had a desire to “C” while the victim did not want to do so, and committed assault by batching the body of the vehicle registration, but the defendant did not reasonably explain how the victim had any interest in transferring the name of the vehicle, and considering the fact that it is difficult to find the reason or motive for the victim to assault the defendant, a thorough examination of the records, the credibility of each statement made by the victim and E and EF can be sufficiently acknowledged.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty in the above judgment is just, and there is no error of misconception of facts as alleged by the defendant.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit.