A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 01:50 on February 17, 2017, the Defendant expressed a bath to “In the situation where there is another customer or a proprietor, i.e., a sprink affiliated with the Steering Police Station D, which was dispatched to the site after receiving a report on a drinking disturbance at the C station located at the bar, on the ground that he does not interfere with the case according to the Defendant’s demand.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insulting the above E.

2. On February 17, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the D police box located in F at F at F at F at F at F at F at F at F at F at F at F at F at F at F at F at the Defendant’s request, received the face of the above E who was performing the instant work on the ground that the said E does not interfere with the handling of the case at

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the police officer who performs legitimate duties concerning criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for G, H, I, and E;

1. The application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (a CD 1 attachment to ctv video).

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Articles 136 (1) and 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution have no record of imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment for the defendant, and the degree of exercise of physical power in the case of a crime interfering with the execution of official duties was not significant, and the punishment is determined as ordered in consideration of favorable circumstances such as the fact that the crime