Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
The defendant shall pay 150,000 won to the applicant for compensation by deceit.
(e).
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On October 4, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Central District Court, and was released on June 30, 2008 at the first prison of the Gyeongbuk District Court, on which the sentence was being executed, on June 30, 2008, and the remaining term of imprisonment was terminated on July 26, 2008.
"2014 Highest 163"
1. On July 2008, the criminal defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the victim in the E-job placement office office of the victim C's operation in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Jongno-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government on July 2008 that "at that time, the victim was an assistant officer for the National Assembly member prior to the example. There are more members of the National Assembly and the assistant members who are more strongly and pro-friendly, and the F members are well f. In particular, the defendant made a false statement to the new city that "I will operate the on-site employee restaurant (the continuous title restaurant) at the site where the Housing Corporation performs its work through the National Assembly members and the assistant members of
However, the defendant did not have served as an assistant to the National Assembly members, and there was no intention or ability to arrange the operation of the restaurant at the construction site through the National Assembly member or the National Assembly assistant.
As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 3 million from the victim as an activity expense, and acquired it by fraud from the victim as well as from around that time to December 15, 2009, the Defendant acquired KRW 150,050,000 in total from the victim seven times, such as the list of crimes (1) in the attached Form from around that time to December 15, 209.
2. On June 8, 2009, the Defendant against the victim G made a false statement to the victim G at the office of the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Htel 904 (Htel 904), stating that “The Defendant has served as an assistant officer of the Speaker of the National Assembly before the inside of the Republic of Korea, who works as the chief specialist of the open party of the Republic of Korea, has a lot of political rights and has a lot of relationship with his political rights, and L Gyeongbuk-do may exercise his influence on M as a house custodian.” After the Defendant made a false statement to the victim G, “M will be ordered to I to give an order for the Scongdong-do canal project supervised by the Gyeongbuk-do.”