logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.01.07 2014고단2122
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 2013, the Defendant forged public document documents at the Defendant’s house located in the Cheongju-si, a considerable amount of Cheongju-si, and then deleted the items of “10 provisional seizure”, “16-party decision to commence compulsory auction”, and “18-party decision to commence compulsory auction” from the column of “A of the copy of the register of Cheongju-si, a computer located in the Cheongju-si, a considerable amount of Cheongju-si, by using the Cheongju-si (hereinafter “instant house”).

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a copy of the register in the name of the officer in charge of computerized operation of the Office of Court Administration Information, which is an official document.

2. On June 29, 2013, the Defendant: (a) borrowed 200,000 won to credit service providers D, and presented it as if he/she were issued a true copy of a certified public document, which is a forged public document, at a coffee shop, where it is impossible to find out the trade name of Cheong-gu, So-young-gu, So-young, Chungcheongnam-si; and (b) the Defendant exercised it.

3. On June 29, 2013, the Defendant presented a forged copy of the register as above to the victim D at the time and place stated in the above paragraph 2, and concluded a false statement to the effect that “B is an over-the-counter patient, and the husband in B and the husband in the Republic of Korea own the instant house 1/2 equity shares. If the Defendant borrowed KRW 2 million, the Defendant would pay 10% interest per month and pay 250,000 won per week until July 28, 2013.”

However, the above certified copy of the register was forged, and the house of this case was under auction and did not have property value, and there was no intention or ability to repay the above money even if it was borrowed from the victim due to no special property or occupation other than the house of this case.

At around 20:05 on the same day, the Defendant received from the victim a remittance of KRW 1.70,000,000 except for a prior interest and KRW 200,000,00 from a new bank account (Account Number) in the name of the Defendant.

4. On July 1, 2013, the Defendant was the defrauded of July 1, 2013, namely, “G” located in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu around 13:00.

arrow