(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.11.09 2016고단1480

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.11.09 2016고단1480

공무집행방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 23, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 00:30 on the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon; (b) on the 112-round 00:30 on April 23, 2016, the Defendant confirmed that the police officer E (the age of 51) affiliated with the D District Police Station D District Station of the Daejeon District Police Station, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report from the reporter, wishes to punish the Defendant who took a bath against the reporter; and (c) stated in the written indictment that “where personal information has occurred in North Korea, it shall be changed; and (d) without making a reply, the Defendant shall be found to have been aware of the fact ex officio to the extent that it does not interfere with the Defendant’s exercise of his/her right to defense.” However, according to the witness E’s testimony, the Defendant’s cat appears to be “Y” in the written indictment.

The knife was made in knife by hand.

As a result, the defendant assaulted police officers E, thereby hindering police officers from performing their legitimate duties on handling reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. The defense counsel did not answer questions asked by the defendant about his personal information, and the police officer first put the defendant. This constitutes an illegal arrest and thus, during that process, the defendant gets the arms of the police officer, and the defendant did not interfere with the performance of official duties.

According to each evidence of the judgment, the following facts are acknowledged: (a) G was under the influence of alcohol on April 23, 2016, and was under the desire of us and was under the influence of 00:14, and was under the influence of us, and was under the demand of us to make a report; (b) G was called the Defendant by the police officer; (c) F and E was defective in order to verify the Defendant’s personal information; (c) the Defendant attempted to escape from the place where she was under the desire of her police officer as stated in its reasoning; and (c) the Defendant was under the influence of her selling and selling the E.

According to the above facts, at the time of this case.

유사 판례

-서울동부지방법원 2015.11.26 2015노436

-청주지방법원 2013.05.31 2012노941

-수원지방법원 2018.02.02 2017노7381

-서울남부지방법원 2015.05.15 2015고단664

-청주지방법원충주지원 2020.11.17 2020고단541