logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.11.21 2018가단8203
건물인도 등
Text

1. The defendant

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

B. KRW 4,290,000 and its interest on July 4, 2018

Reasons

1. On May 18, 2017, the Plaintiff leased a building listed in the attached list to the Defendant as KRW 10,000,000 for a lease deposit, KRW 1,300 for a rent month, KRW 1,300,00 for a rent, from May 15, 2017 to May 14, 2018, and the Plaintiff leased the building to the Defendant on May 15, 2017.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). The Defendant did not pay the vehicle on April 14, 2018 and May 14, 2018, and notified the Plaintiff that he/she had no intent to renew the contract immediately before the expiration of the period.

[Evidence] Each entry of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 and 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the fact that the lease contract of this case is terminated upon the expiration of the term, the defendant delivers the above building to the plaintiff, and the defendant is obligated to return unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from July 4, 2018 to the day of complete payment, which is the day following the delivery of the copy of the complaint of this case sought by the plaintiff, to the day of complete payment, as the sum of the rent in arrears and the unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent in arrears from June 14, 2018 to June 1, 2018.

3. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is accepted.

arrow