1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid.

1. In August 2017, the Plaintiff was awarded a contract with the Defendant for the installation of a golf club in Jeju Island (hereinafter “the primary construction”) in KRW 153,802,00 for the cost, and completed the contract on December 14, 2017. The Plaintiff was awarded a contract with the Defendant for the construction of the underground office in the said golf club (hereinafter “the secondary construction”) in KRW 6,822,455 for the cost, and completed the contract on December 25, 2017.

(1) The Plaintiff: (a) 0. 20. 1; (b) 0. 20. 1; (c) 0. 20. 1; (d) 0. 20. 1; (d) 0. 30. 1; (e) 0. 20. 1; and (e) 0. 0. 20. 14; 980; 0. 30. 16. 16. 16. 20; (c) 0. 30. 20; (d) 0. 30. 14; (e) 14; (e) 0. 14; (e. 16. 16. 30; (e. 16. 20. 30; (e. 14. 14, 200; and (e) 5. 201. 20. 14. 2017

On August 16, 2017, the Plaintiff paid KRW 704,00, F (G) 15,015,000 on September 22, 2017 to J (K) 3,35,000 on September 30, 2017, the sum of KRW 605,000 L (M) 600,600 on November 6, 2017, and KRW 683,00,00 on November 14, 2017 to the Plaintiff, as the sum of KRW 484,007,000 on September 17, 2017, 200 and the instant supply of the materials and equipment to the Plaintiff from September 26, 2017 to September 16, 2017, 205; and

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Eul's evidence 2 to 4 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant should receive the remainder of KRW 13,797,455 (i.e., KRW 153,802,00), while receiving only KRW 146,827,00 from the Defendant as the price for the instant construction work (=6,82,455 won-146,827,00). However, the Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff should be paid the remainder of the construction cost.