A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On April 28, 2013, at around 15:00, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim on the floor of right hand on the ground that the victim F (the age of 32) takes a cell phone image of the situation, and that the face of the victim is unbured, while the player of the E-university directed by the Defendant inside the Dgymnae located in Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F, G, H and I;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Each statement of G and H;

1. Application of CD image Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article 260 of the Criminal Act and Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. The summary of the facts charged was the date and time indicated in the above facts of the crime, and at the same place, the victim’s face was at least once, resulting in injury to the victim, such as chinum, tensions, etc. requiring treatment for about two weeks.

2.In the determination of injury means injury to the completeness of the body of a victim or impairment to physiological functions.

In light of the fact that the sound at the scene was relatively clearly recorded in the video taken by the victim at the time, the victim cannot listen to the sound suitable for the victim, the victim was issued a written diagnosis on the following day of the case, and the written diagnosis was written to the effect that the Defendant’s act was stated in the name of “chlosts and tensions of scambling,” which is not directly related to the Defendant’s act at the time, and that the victim’s occupation was scaming, etc., the victim cannot be deemed to have suffered the above injury due to the Defendant’s assault, and even if he suffered the above injury, it cannot be deemed to be an injury to the extent that the physical integrity is damaged or the physiological function is hindered.

Therefore, this part.