logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.05.16 2012고정2744
상해
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On July 14, 2012, at around 19:00 on July 14, 2012, the Defendant: (a) stated that the victim C (the 16-year-old age), who was in a park in the area where the gueste movement 510 was carried out at the Geak-gu, Geak-gu, Geak-si, Geak-gu, Geak-gu, Geak-gu, Geak-gu, the Defendant: (b) took a bath to “the febb and feat; (c) dump the victim’s feat; and (d) dump the victim’s feat with his hand feb

2. The injury stipulated in Article 257 of the Criminal Code refers to the degree of harm to the completeness of human body or interference with physiological functions.

However, in the case of this case, the Defendant appears to have suffered a flag in the process of flaging the victim's flag by making the victim's flab, but the victim stated in this court that the flab was only flaging to a few minutes at the time of the occurrence of this case, and that the flab did not flad individually at the time of the occurrence of this case. However, in full view of the above cases, although the flab was in fact in the hospital, the victim stated that the flab did not undergo other treatment, such as physical therapy or flabing by prescribing the flabing, etc., the flab or the flab that the flab suffered by the victim appeared to have been naturally cured, and it is difficult to view that the flab suffered the victim's flab or the flab caused the victim's physical integrity or physiological function to the extent that it

3. According to the conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime and thus should be pronounced innocence pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, but the facts charged in the above facts charged include the facts charged that the defendant abused the victim, and this constitutes Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act.

arrow