logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.05.13 2019나74096
부당이득금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the statement of evidence No. 8 additionally submitted by the plaintiff in the court of first instance, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance

Therefore, the reasoning for this Court is that the reasoning for this case is as follows. The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance “(11)”, the fourth part(13) “business telephone number” is “business telephone number”, and the fourth part(19) “tel telephone number” is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the fourth part(s) “tel number” is “tel number” and “tel number” is as stated in the main part of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. Thus, this Court

2. The Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants should be dismissed in entirety due to the lack of reasonable grounds.

The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable in its conclusion. Thus, all appeals filed against the Defendants by the Plaintiff are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow