A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The defendant is an applicant for compensation, who is an applicant for compensation, of KRW 5,700,00.

Punishment of the crime

[2011 Highest 578] M is a person who works as the representative director of the O in the building management service business chain Co., Ltd. in N in Gyeonggi-si from April 2009, and the defendant is a person who actually operates the above company.

1. The Geumcheon-gu Seoul Facilities Management Corporation that jointly commits fraud between the defendant and M did not have any subsidiary, so the above Corporation did not have intended to employ a person responsible for parking in the Corporation or its subsidiary.

Therefore, the defendant and M did not have an intention or ability to find the victim H as a parking person in the above Corporation or subsidiary company.

Nevertheless, the defendant and M intended to acquire money as a security deposit by deceiving the victim as if there is a subsidiary of the above Corporation and the above Corporation or subsidiary is employed.

At the end of September 2010, the Defendant, at the above OO office at the end of the end of the end of the month, concluded that “The Defendant would work as a director-level parking manager of the Seoul Geumcheon-gu Seoul Facilities Management Corporation subsidiaries. The amount of salary will be KRW 4 million. From the end of this month, work from the end of this month, and if employed by the Facilities Management Corporation, the Defendant would pay a deposit of KRW 10,000 to prepare for the utilization of public funds.” The Defendant received the victim’s false statement to the effect that “I would immediately have public bonds issued by the Geumcheon-gu Facilities Management Corporation and make it possible to comply with the time of the public bonds.” The Defendant received KRW 10 million from the victim around October 2, 2010.

Accordingly, the defendant and M conspireds with the victim H, and they received 10 million won as a security deposit for employment.

2. The defendant's fraud did not have the intention or ability to employ the job seeker even though he received the job placement fee.

Nevertheless, the defendant had tried to acquire money from job seekers under the pretext of job placement as if they were employed.

Defendant,

(a) around June 1, 2010, O.O.