Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

In using and managing the means of access used in electronic financial transactions, unless otherwise expressly provided for in other Acts, no one may borrow or borrow means of access while promising to use or rent means of access. However, on October 17, 2019, the Defendant sent text messages to the Defendant’s mobile phone at around 15:10, that “I will grant 50,000 won to her butt money” to the Defendant’s mobile phone, and provided counseling to Kakakaooox, the Defendant’s name in the process of sending out text messages to “I will do any act of illegally her or her own money by accessing the gambling site and holding a private bridge game using a fabricated value.” However, the Defendant’s account cannot be used in our name any more than on the wind. If you lend a charging account to the gambling site account and the gambling game, the Defendant’s name in the name of the Defendant’s bank at around 120, 2019, with the consent of the Defendant’s bank’s 10% of the charged amount.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to provide compensation and lent the means of access.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the police statement made by the defendant to F of the defendant's legal statement to the police statement, detailed statement of transfer of funds, text messages, such as data on transactions of D A account transactions, and Stockholm statutes;

1. Relevant Article 49(4)2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and Articles 6(3)2 and 6(3)2 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the crime was committed during the period of suspension of execution for the same kind of crime for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the previous crime is different from the previous crime, provided that it was committed on one occasion of lending, and that it was only agreed with the victim of the Bosing fraud crime related to the account linked to the means of access leased by the defendant.