logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 장흥지원 2015.07.02 2014고정13
공전자기록등불실기재등
Text

The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On October 21, 201, the Defendant was issued from the C Line D (hereinafter “instant real estate”) from the C Line D (hereinafter “instant real estate”), and was in office as a pastor of the E church located in the Gangnam Jinjin-gun (hereinafter “instant real estate”), and on April 15, 201, the Defendant was willing to change the E Line to the F intersection.

In order to change the name of a church in accordance with the articles of incorporation of the above church, the defendant has held an ordinary general meeting and received two-thirds or more of the general meeting, but there has not been no fact of holding an ordinary

Nevertheless, around April 18, 2013, the Defendant applied for the registration of change of the name of the registered titleholder with the content of changing the name “Korea Egrative Dratives Association Egratives Association Egratives Association Egratives Association Egratives Association Egratives Association” to a public official of the aforesaid Gangwon-do registry office who is aware of such fact.

Accordingly, the above public official who is unaware of such fact entered the land register for the real estate in the case of this case into computerized input that the change of name on April 15, 2013 should be completed by the registration of change of the name of the registered titleholder who is the cause of registration.

In this respect, the defendant made a false report to the public official, and recorded false facts in the land register which is the same electronic record as the original copy of a notarial deed.

B. Around that time, the Defendant had the above Gangseo registry office keep and exercise the above land registry that recorded false facts.

C. At around 19:00 on June 4, 2013, the Defendant interfered with his duties: (a) around 15, 15 persons, including the victim G (52 years of age), who was subject to the order of movement issued by the C Line as of June 3, 2013, enter the said EM Association as of June 3, 2013; (b) around 15, including the Defendant, before the said church’s entrance, the Defendant prevented the Defendant and 15 new persons, who followed the order; and (c) “this church is our church, and we left the CM Association;

(e).

arrow