logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.07.19 2016누34310
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "the deceased" under Section 2, Section 9 of the first instance court's judgment "the deceased's left bridge" and "the second part of the fourth part of the court's judgment "the deceased did not provide separate transit vehicles or pay to the deceased money in terms of expenses for commuting to and from work or oil expenses"; "No evidence 4-1 of the third part of the court's judgment"; "No evidence 10-1 to No. 4, 23"; "No evidence 10-1 to No. 5, 6, 8, and 10-10-2 of the fifth part of the court's judgment "No. 10-2 of the court's judgment"; "No. 24,25" shall be added to "No. 10-2 of the court's judgment"; and "No. 24,25" shall be cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 40 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The decision of the first instance court is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow