Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance, etc. shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, on May 8, 2015, the Defendant driven an EB-type car not covered by mandatory insurance, etc. from the D Institute to the 2-dong Saemaul Treasury located on the side of the D Institute on a road without a vehicle from the C cafeteria located in Seogu Daegu, Daegu, Seo-gu. B.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the On-Site map, actual survey report, tea inquiry, and the ledger of driver's licenses for motor vehicles;

1. Article 46 (2) 2 and Article 8 of the Guarantee of Compensation for Damages Caused by Motor Vehicles Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a vehicle E in a vehicle E in the Republic of Korea.

On May 8, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car at a speed of 20:30, while driving the said car, led to a road without the front line of the C cafeteria in Seogu-gu, Daegu-gu, to a speed of 2,00,000 from the side of the D Private Institutes to the side of the Saemaul Treasury.

A person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to accurately operate the steering direction and brake system by checking well the left and right of the front side.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this while driving at the same speed and contacted the right side part of the G Ra car which is driving by the victim F(25 tax) with the vehicle driven by the defendant due to the negligence of driving at the same speed with the front side of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the victim’s vehicle repair cost of KRW 330,000 due to the above occupational negligence.

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

(2) The records are as follows.