1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On February 16, 2016, the Defendant driven a C rocketing car, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, at the mar line (or approximately 200 meters away from Geumcheon-IC to the mar line) located in Geumcheon-do, Geumcheon-do, Geumcheon-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes regarding de facto survey and mandatory insurance;

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Compensation for Damages of Motor Vehicles that choose to be punished;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of the facts charged in this part is a person driving Crocketing another car.

On February 16, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at a speed of 13:30 on the 16th day of February, 2016, and flowed to a speed below the speed of the Si-high speed, from the IC bank to the breadth of the IC bank at a speed of 200 meters.

At this point, since the exclusive road and the branch line of a motor vehicle are boomed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely enter the road according to the road situation by reducing the speed and living well on the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, the part on the right side side of the victim D(40 cc) driving, which had been driving the same speed as the two-lanes of the car dedicated to the vehicle, was received as the part on the left side side of the defendant's driver's vehicle, and damaged the above knife to repair the above knife amounting to 41,970 won.

2. This part of the facts charged is an offense falling under Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act and shall not be prosecuted against the express will of the victim pursuant to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

In this regard, according to the statements of the victim in this Court, the victim is the victim of this case.