logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.02.02 2016고단1588
업무상과실치상등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months and fines of 3,000,000 won, Defendant B’s imprisonment without prison labor of 10 months, and Defendant C’s stock company of 10,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 1588"

1. Defendant C Co., Ltd. (former trade name: D Co., Ltd.; hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”) is a corporation engaged in the business of producing gas at the J ineyang-si. Defendant A is a person who, without delay, manages the overall business of the above company, and Defendant E is a person who operated K gas retail in 1,000 city.

(a) Where the owner of a high-pressure gas jointly committed by Defendant A and Defendant E intends to change the type of high-pressure gas to be filled in the container, he/she shall undergo a reinspection by the competent authority on the container, and where he/she fails to undergo a reinspection, he/she shall not transfer, lease or use (including gas charging) such container;

Defendant

E In the course of operating a gas-seller, it is not enough to supply liquid ruptures to the customer while operating the gas-seller, and in order to change the type of high-pressure gas to be filled in the container, it is difficult to charge the existing liquid rupture container and liquid rupture container without undergoing a re-inspection of the container. The above Defendant A, who is an employee of the gas manufacturer, requested the gas manufacturer, to charge liquid ruptures and liquid ruptures of liquid ruptures to charge the existing liquid rupture container and liquid ruptures of liquid ruptures without undergoing a re-inspection of the container. The Defendant A filled the liquid rupture container and liquid rupture container without undergoing a re-inspection at the request of Defendant E, who is the customer.

1) On February 28, 2015, at the Defendant Company’s office, Defendant A filled a liquid volcano container with charge from Defendant E to charge it for a difficulty in liquid volcano container, and upon receipt of a request for request from Defendant E, Defendant A filled a liquid volcano container without undergoing re-inspection.

2) On July 29, 2015, Defendant A received a request from Defendant E for filling liquid nitrogen containers at the same place as above and making it difficult for Defendant E to charge liquefied nitrogen containers.

arrow