The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the fact that the summary of the grounds of appeal acknowledges the fact that the defendant was closely aware of the victim, and that the statements made by the police officer who observed the indecent act and the statements made by the victim coincide with the considerable part of the victim, the fact of indecent act by the

I would like to say.

Nevertheless, the court below acquitted the charged facts of this case, and the court below erred by misapprehending the facts.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: (a) around 18:54 on June 7, 2018, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim of the instant case, with the Defendant’s sexual part attached thereto, such as the victim, etc., attached to subway No. 1 line 1 line prior to the rapid operation of subway No. 2054 on June 7, 2018.

B. On the grounds delineated below, the lower court determined that there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge that the Defendant intentionally committed an indecent act against the victim on the sole basis of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, and that there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

1) The victim took an oath as a witness in the court of the court below, and her body was mixed to the side of the subway at the time, and her body was flicked to the inside of the subway at the time, and her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

However, F takes an oath as a witness in the court of original trial, and at the time the defendant's act is present.