Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. On July 31, 2017, around 19:26, the Defendant got off the victim’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her part from the new picture station in Guro-gu Seoul, Guro-gu, to the her her station 1:5-21 from the her her her her own her her her own her own her own her part of the subway 1, which had been in operation from the her her her her own her fore to the her station her station 1:5 to the her her herst herst herst herst herst her part
Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim on the electric car that is a concentrated means of public transportation.
2. Determination
A. The burden of proof for the criminal facts prosecuted in a criminal trial is to be borne by the public prosecutor, and the conviction of guilt is to be based on evidence with probative value that makes the judge feel true beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, even if there is doubt as to the defendant's guilt, it is inevitable to determine the defendant's interest as the defendant's interest (see Supreme Court Decision 2001Do2823, Aug. 21, 2001, etc.). (B) As evidence as shown in the facts charged in the instant case, there is each statement of D and police officer who arrested the victim and the defendant and taken video images, and there is a video CD if the crime is committed.
However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence revealed in the records of the instant case, the Defendant intentionally committed an indecent act on the part of the said evidence alone.
There is insufficient evidence to acknowledge it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
1) The victim, who took an oath as a witness in this Court and she committed an indecent act against himself/herself even though he/she had been she had been sworn in two booms.
We were unable to feel, and there was a perception that many people were sealed, and that the police officer made a statement that he/she want to punish the accused on the ground that he/she was clearly aware that his/her indecent act was committed by the police officer.
was stated.
In addition, the prosecutor shall submit as evidence and in this Court.