A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) reported to the investigation agency; and (b) reported the defect to the investigation agency; and (c) found the victim’s resistance to the “D cafeteria” in the “D cafeteria” located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul operated by the Defendant, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul.

At around 18:00 on April 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim’s desire to “Chewingly” by having the victim file a complaint and sound; (b) subsequently, the Defendant entered the said “D cafeteria” and opened the said “D cafeteria,” thereby making the customers, who were eating food, unable to take meals at the same time, and prevented them from entering the said cafeteria.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. On April 20, 2015, the Defendant, at around 18:20 on April 20, 2015, expressed that “D restaurant” as indicated in paragraph (1) refers to the following: (a) the Defendant: (b) reported 112 to the effect that her son wears his son while wearing a uniform; and (c) she heard the statements of the victim B and witness specified in paragraph (1) and sent to the scene; and (d) the Defendant expressed his son’s desire to her son while hearing his son’s statement; and (b) the Defendant expressed that “I son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son me to arrest him as an offender in the act of interference with the performance of his duties.” (c) she assaulted the above F’s son son by drinking once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the 112 report processing by police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement related to F and B;

1. Each statement of G and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (report on the hearing of F party telephone statements by a victim police officer);

1. Criminal facts;