A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 21, 2017, the Defendant, from around 12:34 to 12:54 on May 21, 2017, 2017, committed the crime, committed with the intent to steals, instead of having her son F and son G enter the E store managed by the victim D on the first floor of the Sincheon-si building C, and with his son F and son G, with his employees’ supervision neglected, in order to steal the pro ratas.

Defendant and F directly collected goods necessary for their own bags or children's bags, or collected goods from G to the above bank, and added them into the market value of 45,000 won in total (one cellular phone product, three pentle, one string, one bicycle string, one string, one string for vehicles, one tax system, one durf, one sturf, one box for vehicles, and one lurf, one box for sanitation, one stopl, one stop for one stopl, one single stop, one for single stopl, one for one day, one for burgl, one for burgl, one for burgl, one for burgl, one for clicker, one for clibl, one for string, one for tick, and one for water string).

As a result, the defendant stolen the property managed by the injured party together with F.

2. From June 24, 2017 to June 18:16, 2017, the Defendant, without calculating the market price of the goods ( approximately KRW 6,000, KRW 1, tax system, KRW 2, 200) in the above manner, instead of placing the heat products, which were re-entered with F and G, into the said E store, from June 24, 2017 to June 18:16.

As a result, the defendant stolen the property managed by the injured party together with F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement concerning F in the protocol of suspect interrogation of the police officer;

1. The descriptions of each statement of D;

1. Each entry in each receipt, each CCTV photograph, each record of seizure, and the list of seizure, each damaged photograph, and each entry in CCTV image CD and the application of statutes related to video;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following sentence grounds are favorable.