logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2019.01.30 2018고단1049
공문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and three months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative director of B Co., Ltd (hereinafter referred to as "B") with the purpose of gas pipeline construction business, such as urban gas pipeline construction.

1. Around November 2017, the Defendant: (a) entered into a contract for the installation of urban gas facilities in the above complex with D, the owner of the building of six exclusive houses and six exclusive houses on the land, non-Party C; and (b) submitted a written request for a review of supply to obtain approval for linking the urban gas supply facilities and middle pressure pipes installed and managed by E, Inc. (hereinafter “E”), an urban gas business entity, with the above six exclusive complexes.

However, approval of the above E can only be obtained from the case where there are eight or more houses on one parcel or where one household uses urban gas exceeding 3,000 cubic meters per annum for business use, etc., in addition to one complex whose purpose of use has been changed to "Class II neighborhood living facilities (general restaurants)" among the above six complexes, it is impossible to obtain approval for the connection of the entrance into the remaining complex into the part of the complex consisting of only "self-house". As the defendant was unable to obtain approval for the connection of the entrance into the part of the other complex, the defendant forged a certificate of completion of report on the alteration of the purpose of construction into large-scale repair (hereinafter "certificate of completion of report") on the one complex issued as of November 15, 2017 as if he were a certificate of completion of report on the remaining two-six complexes and submitted it to E.

On June 29, 2018, the Defendant: (a) copied a certificate of completion of report in the name of G-Myeon on November 15, 2017 on a B-Ocheon-si and one parcel; (b) recorded “D (1 complex); (c) recorded “D (1 complex”; and (d) recorded “(2 complex” in the name of the owner of the report completion certificate on the two complex in the name of the building; and (c) removed the part of “C detached (D1 complex)” in the name of the building in an irregular manner.

arrow