1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the dismissal or addition of the judgment of the first instance and the additional decision under Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance.

Part 2, "2015..." shall be referred to as "2016...."

Part 3, 7, the “3,847,870 won” is deemed to be “26,319,270 won.”

No. 4, "before the last day" is dismissed as "seven days prior to the commencement," and No. 5, respectively, and according to the results of fact inquiry into the Jeju market for the first instance, the Jeju market is supported by the defendant and the Jeju market is supported by the defendant from August 30, 2016 to the same year.

9. In conducting the instant on-site investigation by February 2, 201, it appears to be notified that the instant on-site investigation was scheduled as above on August 29, 2016, the preceding day.

In addition, “The 6th 14th 14th am recognized” added “(the Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant did not clearly present the applicable laws and regulations of the instant disposition, but the Defendant stated that the applicable laws and regulations of the instant disposition were Article 43(1)3 of the Long-Term Care Insurance Act, and that the grounds for the restitution disposition in the reply clearly presented that the grounds for the Act on Long-Term Care Insurance for the Aged are Article 43(1)3 of the Long-Term Care Insurance Act.” Following the 9th 6th 6th mar, the “facts” is followed.