logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 04. 26. 선고 2018두32477 판결
명의신탁이 조세회피의 목적이 아닌 다른 목적이 있다고 볼 수 있고, 회피가능한 조세가 없음[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu-53202 ( December 20, 2017)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho Jae-2015-Seoul Office-4836 ( December 30, 2015)

Title

Title trust may be deemed to have a purpose other than the purpose of tax avoidance, and there is no tax avoidance.

Summary

In order to comply with the duty not to engage in the competitive business, title trust was held in order to observe the duty not to engage in the competitive business, and there is no amount of dividend paid, etc.

Related statutes

Article 45-2 of the former Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act [Presumption of Donation of Title Trust Property]

Cases

2018Du32477 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Gift Tax

Plaintiff

LGR foreign1

Defendant

J Head of J Tax Office

Imposition of Judgment

on April 26, 2018

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

All of the judgment below and the appellate brief examined the records of this case, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, or are recognized to be groundless. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of

arrow