The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On July 14, 2016, the Defendant:

On July 15, 2016, the telephone contact with each other, entered into a loan transaction agreement of KRW 12 million with interest rate of KRW 27.9% per annum on the (B) vehicle-backed loan to the LOF on July 15, 2016, and set up a mortgage of KRW 15.6 million.

Although the Defendant decided to repay the amount of the loan over a period of 36 months, the Defendant did not repay the amount after the last day of October 28, 2016.

Therefore, the victim took a payment order (7290, before Seoul Southern District Court 2016, before 2016) to exercise the right to collateral, and notified this fact to the defendant, but the defendant interfered with the exercise of the right to the above vehicle of the victim by concealing the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the written complaint and accompanying documents of Rodcop;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 323 of the Criminal Act selective punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 1,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act ( full payment of debt, revocation of complaint, and consideration of various conditions for sentencing);