beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014. 04. 09. 선고 2013누10948 판결

지배주주등 임원에게 정당한 사유 없이 과다 지급한 급여는 손금부인 대상임[국승]

Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court 2012Guhap29240 ( October 15, 2013)

Title

The excessive benefits paid to executive officers of the controlling shareholder, etc. without justifiable grounds shall be deemed as non-deductible expenses.

Summary

Where a corporation pays remuneration to an officer who is a controlling stockholder in excess of the amount paid to an officer in the same position without justifiable grounds, the excess amount shall be excluded from deductible expenses, and the internal regulations of the corporation, such as articles of incorporation, do not constitute justifiable

Cases

2013Nu10948 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing Corporate Tax, etc.

Plaintiff and appellant

AA Development Corporation

Defendant, Appellant

BB Head of tax office et al.

Judgment of the first instance court

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2012Guhap29240 decided March 15, 2013

Conclusion of Pleadings

March 5, 2014

Imposition of Judgment

April 9, 2014

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are requested by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. Each disposition of the Head of Seocho Tax Office of April 1, 201 (including additional taxes), the corporate tax of 2006 business year of 2006, the corporate tax of 000 won (including additional taxes), the corporate tax of 2007 business year of 2007, and the disposition of the Head of Seoul Regional Tax Office of April 5, 201, the income earner of 2006, the income earner of 2006 of which was KimA as KimA, shall be revoked, respectively.

Reasons

This court's decision is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it refers to Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.