beta
red_flag_2(영문) 서울고등법원 2012. 07. 13. 선고 2011누42156 판결

설비 등 일반자산의 양도가액은 부동산 양도가액에서 제외한 것으로 보여짐[국승]

Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court 201Gudan11511 ( November 04, 2011)

Case Number of the previous trial

National Tax Service Review and Transfer 2010-0371 (201.03.04)

Title

The transfer value of general assets, such as facilities, shall be deemed excluded from the transfer value of real estate.

Summary

(The same as the judgment of the court of first instance) Where real estate is transferred by concluding and implementing a business transfer/acquisition contract including real estate, it is difficult to recognize that the transfer value of machinery and equipment among the transfer proceeds is excluded from the transfer value of general assets and is included in the transfer value of facilities.

Related statutes

Article 96 of the Income Tax Act

Cases

2011Nu42156 Revocation of imposition of capital gains tax

Plaintiff and appellant

Park XX

Defendant, Appellant

The Director of Gangnam District Office

Judgment of the first instance court

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2011Gudan11511 decided November 4, 2011

Conclusion of Pleadings

June 12, 2012

Imposition of Judgment

July 13, 2012

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked.

The Defendant’s disposition of imposition of capital gains tax of KRW 000 for the year 2007 against the Plaintiff on November 1, 2010 shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning for the court's explanation on this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of the first instance, and thus, it is also accepted by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim seeking the revocation of the disposition of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is justified as it is in conclusion, and it is so decided as per Disposition.