beta
(영문) 대법원 2009. 09. 10. 선고 2009두8588 판결

무권대리행위에 대한 증여세 부과처분의 위법 여부[국승]

Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2008Nu26444 (Law No. 29, 2009)

Title

Whether the imposition of gift tax on an act of unauthorized representation is illegal

Summary

An absentee's act of unauthorized representation performed by the administrator without the permission of the court does not constitute an invalid act because the administrator of the absentee's property successors have ratified it, and a disposition of imposition on such act is not unlawful.

The decision

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

Text

The appeal shall be dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the statement of the grounds of appeal by appellant were examined, but the grounds of appeal by appellant are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed under Article 15 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent