beta
(영문) 대법원 2016.3.24.선고 2015도8417 판결

모욕

Cases

2015Do8417 Defluence

Defendant

A person shall be appointed.

Appellant

Defendant

Defense Counsel

B Law Firm (Attorney C, Q)

Judgment of the lower court

Suwon District Court Decision 2014No2495 Decided May 22, 2015

Imposition of Judgment

March 24, 2016

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower judgment, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the instant facts charged was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning, and did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on legitimate acts.

In addition, the argument that the court below erred in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the offense of insult is not a legitimate ground for appeal, which is alleged in the ground of appeal by the defendant, or by the court below that the defendant did not consider it as a subject of judgment ex officio.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Park Jae-young

Justices Kim Yong-deok

Justices Lee In-bok

Justices Kim Gin-young

State Justice Lee Ki-taik-taik

심급 사건
-의정부지방법원고양지원 2014.10.16.선고 2014고정988