Attorney F-ho et al.

For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court did not prove the facts charged of this case.

The judgment of the court of first instance which acquitted the defendant was affirmed.

Examining the record, the above determination by the court below is justifiable. Contrary to logical and empirical rules

In violation of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or errors in the legal principles on contributions under the Public Official Election Act.

No error, such as impairing judgment or omitting judgment, shall be made.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

shall be determined.

Justices Kim Jae-tae

Justices Jo Hee-de

Justices Park Sang-ok