[보호감호][공1986.4.15.(774),584]
The meaning of "a person with a total of three years or more" under Article 5 (2) 1 of the Social Protection Act;
Article 5 (2) 1 of the Social Protection Act refers to a person whose total term of punishment is at least three years, which means a person whose total term of punishment is at least three years. Thus, if the sum of the term of imprisonment with prison labor imposed on three occasions is at least three years, the person subject to a petition for reduction of punishment falls under "a person whose total term of punishment is at least three years" even if the period of imprisonment with prison labor imposed on three occasions is less than three years after obtaining parole during the said period.
Article 5 (2) of the Social Protection Act
Supreme Court Decision 83Do113 Decided June 28, 1983
Applicant for Custody
Applicant for Custody
Seoul High Court Decision 85No2313,85No289 Decided November 6, 1985
The appeal is dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined.
Article 5 (2) 1 of the Social Protection Act provides that "a person whose total term of punishment is at least three years" means a person whose total term of punishment is at least three years. Thus, if the sum of imprisonment with prison labor imposed three times over three years is less than three years, a person subject to a request for a request for a protective custody shall receive benefits during the period of parole, and even if the actual term of punishment is less than three years, the person subject to a request for a protective custody shall be "a person with prison labor for at least three years" (see Supreme Court Decision 83Do113, Jun. 28, 1983). Thus, in light of the records of a single case, the court below's decision recognized the fact subject to protective custody against the person subject to a request for a protective custody as above is just and there is no error in recognizing the fact subject to protective custody. Therefore, there is no argument to
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges.
Justices Jeon Soo-soo (Presiding Justice)