변호사법위반
2017Do14618 Violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act
A person shall be appointed.
Defendant
Seoul Eastern District Court Decision 2017No216 Decided August 18, 2017
March 13, 2018
The appeal is dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined.
Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court’s prosecution of this case
We affirm the judgment of conviction of facts. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the law of logic and experience
No error exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of the rules or misapprehending the relevant legal principles.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
shall be determined.
Justices Jo Hee-de
Justices Kim Jae-tae
Justices Kim Jae-in
Justices Min You-sook of the District Court