Article 2 (2) of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act requires that two or more co-offenders exist in so-called co-offenders relationship between them. It is reasonable that only if several persons recognize the injury or assault committed by others on the same opportunity at the same time and inflict an injury or assault on them by using the same opportunity, and compared with the records of each evidence and other evidence pointed out in the arguments, Defendant 2 does not call Defendant 1, who was the victim without the participation in the fighting between Defendant 1 and Nonindicted 1, and asked the fighting with himself, and it can be recognized that there was a fighting between them. Thus, the court below is justified in holding that Defendant 1 did not jointly commit the act of violence by Defendant 2, or that Defendant 2 did not jointly commit the act of violence by Defendant 1, or that Defendant 2 did not commit the act of violence by the victim, and that each of the facts charged against Defendant 2's violation of the rules of evidence or the punishment of each of the Defendants 1 and 2, and therefore, the court below did not err in the misapprehension of legal principles.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Supreme Court Judge Yang Byung-ho (Presiding Judge)