beta
(영문) 대법원 1976. 6. 22. 선고 75다482 판결

[징계처분무효확인][집25(2)민,142;공1976.8.1.(541),9255]

Main Issues

Materials to determine whether a disciplinary action against a private school teacher is appropriate;

Summary of Judgment

In determining the legitimacy of a disciplinary action against a private school teacher, the disciplinary committee should determine the legitimacy of the disciplinary action based on the facts which were the grounds for the disciplinary action, and it does not include the grounds cited in the litigation process.

Plaintiff-Appellee

[Judgment of the court below]

Defendant-Appellant

Attorney Han-py, Counsel for the defendant-appellee of a school foundation

original decision

Seoul High Court Decision 74Na1465 delivered on February 19, 1975

Text

The appeal is dismissed. The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

Judgment on the grounds of appeal Nos. 1 and 2 by Defendant Attorney;

According to the reasoning of the judgment, the court below rejected the defendant's rejection of the above disciplinary action against the defendant's non-permanent school foundation's non-existence of office on the ground that the defendant's non-permanent school foundation's non-existence of office and non-permanent school's non-existence of office without permission, dismissal of the plaintiff from office as the defendant's non-permanent school foundation's non-existence of office. The court below's dismissal of the plaintiff's non-permanent school's non-existence of office under the ground that the defendant's non-permanent school foundation's non-existence of office's non-permanent school's non-existence of office's non-existence of office's non-permanent school's non-existence of office's non-permanent school's non-existence of office's non-permanent school's non-existence of office's non-permanent school's non-existence of office's non-permanent school's non-existence of office's non-permanent school's non-existence of office's non-permanent school's non-existence of office.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as without merit. The costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Han-jin (Presiding Justice)