감봉처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. From April 1, 2016, the Plaintiff served as the chief of the operations division at the 11th Skick Team No. 975 Skick Team.
B. On May 16, 2017, the Defendant imposed a disciplinary action for salary reduction of three months (hereinafter “instant disposition”) against the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 56 of the Military Personnel Management Act on the following grounds:
Under Article 26 of the Framework Act on the Status and Service of Soldiers (Prohibition of Private Sanctions and Abuse of Authority) the Plaintiff is responsible for not doing so, verbal abuse, cruel acts, etc. by abusing official authority in any case.
Nevertheless, the plaintiff
A. 1) From October 2016 to December 12, 2016, there was a fact that: (a) the head of Si/Gun/Gu, who did not follow the direction and control of 1st 5th son, issued an order of 1st 6th son to the head of Si/Gun/Gu to the head of Si/Gun/Gu to the head of Si/Gun/Gu to the head of Si/Gun/Gu; (b) the head of Si/Gun/Gu to the head of Si/Gun/Gu to the head of Si/Gun/Gu to the head of Si/Gun/Gu to the head of Si/Gun/Gu to the head of Si/Gun/Gu to the head of Si/Gun/Gu to the head of Si/Gun/Gu to the head of Si/Gun/Gu to the head of Si/Gun/Gu to the head of Si/Gun/Gu to the head of Si/Gun/Gu to the head of Si/Gun/Gu to the head of Si/Gun/Gu to the head of Si/Gun/Gu to the head of Si/Gu.