가준강간미수·나.부정청탁및금품등수수의금지에관한법률위반
2020Do2349 Attempted quasi-rape
(b) Violation of the Improper Solicitation and Graft Act;
A
Defendant
Law Firm Lee Hun-han
Attorney Kim Woo, and Kim Sung-jin
Attorney Kim Young-soo, Kim Jong-chul, and Kim Tae-tae
Seoul High Court Decision 2019No1770 Decided February 7, 2020
May 14, 2020
The appeal shall be dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent that the grounds of appeal are supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).
Based on the reasoning stated in the judgment below, the lower court convicted the Defendant of the attempted quasi-rape part of the facts charged in the instant case. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence contrary to logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the victim’s statement credibility judgment, or attempted disability judgment. Therefore, the lower court’s dismissal of the appeal is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating
Justices Lee Ki-taik
Justices Kwon Soon-il
Justices Park Jung-hwa
Jeju High Court Justice Kim Jong-soo