임원취임승인취소처분취소
2016Nu697 Revocation of revocation of approval of taking office
A
The Minister of Education
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2016Guhap61051 Decided September 2, 2016
March 24, 2017
April 28, 2017
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
1. Purport of claim
On February 3, 2016, the Defendant’s cancellation disposition of taking office against the Plaintiff is revoked.
2. Purport of appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be quoted by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.
The presiding judge, senior judge
Judges Shin Jin-hee
Judges Lee Jae-chul