(심리불속행)민사소송법 제451조 제1항 각호의 재심사유에 해당하지 않아 이 사건 소는 부적법함[국승]
Seoul High Court 2014Nu53 (Law No. 125, 2014)
Transfer 2011-0300
The lawsuit of this case is unlawful because it does not constitute a ground for retrial under any subparagraph of Article 451(1) of the Civil Procedure Act.
In comparison with the grounds for the decision on review (the original trial), the circumstances asserted by the Plaintiff do not constitute any grounds for review under any subparagraph of Article 451(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, and thus, the instant lawsuit is unlawful.
2014Du10509 Revocation of disposition of imposing capital gains tax
KimA
The head of Yangcheon Tax Office
Seoul High Court Decision 2014Nu53 Decided June 25, 2014
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff (Plaintiff).
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the appellant’s grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. The appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided