beta
(영문) 대법원 1983. 5. 24. 선고 82누456 판결

[양도소득세부과처분취소][공1983.7.15.(708),1023]

Main Issues

The case holding that the disposition of cancellation of the disposition of capital gains tax, etc. is not specified

Summary of Judgment

The judgment order shall be clearly specified within the scope of accepting and rejecting the claim, and it shall be determined so that the rights or legal relations can be specified in view of res judicata or compulsory execution, and it shall not be clearly specified that the amount of the tax imposed is revoked, but the transfer income tax corresponding to the portion exceeding the tax base amount of KRW 1,136,579 and the defense tax corresponding thereto shall be revoked, and the order of judgment cannot be maintained because it is not clear to which standard the tax base amount is calculated.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 193 of the Civil Procedure Act

Reference Cases

Supreme Court Decision 65Da1427 Decided September 21, 1965

Plaintiff-Appellee

Plaintiff

Defendant-Appellant

Head of Suwon Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 82Gu45 delivered on August 17, 1982

Text

The judgment below is reversed and the case is remanded to Seoul High Court.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined ex officio prior to judgment.

According to the judgment of the court below, with respect to the plaintiff's claim of this case seeking the revocation of tax disposition of KRW 1,521,37 of capital gains tax in 1980 imposed by the defendant against the plaintiff on February 14, 1981, and of KRW 152,133 of capital gains tax in 1980, the court below ruled that the defendant revoked the part concerning capital gains tax base and the defense tax corresponding to the portion exceeding KRW 1,136,579 of capital gains tax amount and the defense tax amount corresponding to the amount exceeding KRW 1,521,37 of capital gains tax in 1980 and the defense tax amount corresponding thereto, and dismissed the remaining claims of the plaintiff.

The judgment order is a conclusion as to the propriety of a lawsuit or the propriety of a claim, and it is clearly specified within the scope of admitting or rejecting the claim, and in light of res judicata or compulsory execution, it is necessary to specify the rights or legal relations, and in particular, it is not clearly specified that the above order of the judgment of the court below is revoked, but it is not clearly specified that the amount of the tax imposed is revoked. However, it is ordered to cancel the transfer income tax corresponding to the portion exceeding 1,136,579 won, and the corresponding defense tax base amount, and it is not clear which amount of the tax is calculated according to what criteria the tax base amount is, and thus, it cannot be said that the cancelled tax disposition is specified.

Therefore, since the judgment of the court below cannot maintain clarity that should be prepared as a judgment, it is not possible to decide on the grounds of appeal, and it is remanded to the court below for a new trial and determination. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges.

Justices Lee Il-young (Presiding Justice)