beta
(영문) 대전고등법원 2016.11.02 2016누11887

부정당업자 제재 취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation of this case is that the part concerning "the Act on Contracts to Which the State Is a Party" No. 45 of the first instance judgment No. 1 is "the Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party" (amended by Act No. 14038, Mar. 2, 2016; hereinafter the same shall apply). The fourth part of "Enforcement Decree of the Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party" No. 12 is "the former Enforcement Decree of the Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party" (amended by Presidential Decree No. 27475, Sept. 2, 2016; hereinafter the same shall apply), the fifth part of "Enforcement Rule of the Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party" No. 1, 1, 2, 1000, 1, 2000, 1, 3000, 1, 400, 1, 2017).