The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

After compiling the adopted evidence, the lower court acknowledged the facts as indicated in its reasoning. On May 31, 1992, the lower court determined that the instant disposition rejecting the Plaintiff’s application for registration of persons of distinguished service to the State was unlawful on a different premise, on the ground that the Plaintiff’s failure to file the application was caused by high-speed and pulpying on the left-hand side, which was incurred by the Plaintiff while performing his official duty.

In light of the records, the above fact-finding and judgment of the court below are just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the requirements of soldier or policeman wounded on duty or the proximate causal relation under Article 4(1)6 of the Act

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Kim Yong-deok

Justices Ko Young-han

Justices Kim So-young