beta
(영문) 대법원 2012. 05. 24. 선고 2012두4326 판결

(심리불속행) 양도담보 목적으로 주식명의가 이전되어 증여의제 대상이 아님[국패]

Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2011Nu3312 (Law No. 12, 2012)

Case Number of the previous trial

early 2010west2042 ( December 29, 2010)

Title

(Incompetence of Hearing) The name of shares for the purpose of transfer is not subject to deemed donation due to transfer.

Summary

(C) In light of the legal principles as to the constructive gift of title trust, the legal principle as to the constructive gift of title trust cannot be applied to the ownership of the shares for the purpose of transfer to an obligor, since the ownership of the shares for the purpose of transfer to an obligee is not the ownership of the shares.

Cases

2012Du4326 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Gift Tax

Plaintiff-Appellee

XX

Defendant-Appellant

Head of Guro Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2011Nu33312 Decided January 12, 2012

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

Although examining all of the records of this case, the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal, it is clear that the grounds of appeal by the appellant fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and thus, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

Reference materials.

If the grounds for final appeal are not included in the grounds of appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of final appeal will not continue to proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final appeal, but will not proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final