(영문) 전주지방법원 2012. 12. 4. 선고 2011드단3520 판결[친생자관계부존재확인][미간행]
Plaintiff 1 and one other
Defendant
November 20, 2012
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
It is confirmed that there is no parental relation between the plaintiffs and the defendant.
The plaintiffs are not the plaintiffs' natural father, and in fact, they are the children of the non-party 1, while the non-party 1 was living in the non-party 2's family, who was the plaintiff 1's father, and when the defendant was the age to leave the school, the defendant requested the non-party 2 to enter the name of the non-party 2. The non-party 2 again requested the non-party 3 who was his father's father, and the non-party 3 reported the birth of the non-party 3 as a child born between the plaintiffs. However, there is no other evidence to acknowledge this.
Thus, the plaintiffs' claims of this case are all dismissed as it is without merit.
Judges Lee Young-ho