beta
orange_flag(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2010. 7. 15. 선고 2009고정747,2009고정748(병합),2009고정757(병합),2010고정134(병합) 판결

[공인중개사의업무및부동산거래신고에관한법률위반·정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반·상해·폭행][미간행]

Escopics

Defendant

Prosecutor

Flags

Defense Counsel

Attorney Kim Tae-tae (Korean)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,200,00.

When the defendant fails to pay the above fine, the defendant shall be confined in a workhouse for the period converted by 50,000 won into one day.

Criminal facts

[209 High Court Decision 747]

1. Violation of the Business Affairs of Licensed Real Estate Agents and Report of Real Estate Transactions Act;

On June 8, 2009, the Defendant run the brokerage business by arranging the sale and purchase of forest land at the rate of 150 square meters (number omitted) in the Sinsan-ri (hereinafter “○○ Real Estate”) in the Sinsan-ri (hereinafter “○○ Real Estate”), a competent administrative agency, and without registering the establishment of a brokerage office in the Sinsan-ri (hereinafter “○○ Real Estate”).

2. Violation of Information and Communications Network Utilization Promotion Act.

The Defendant, at the time from the above date to August 11:45, 2009, sent a text message to the victim’s cell phone (number 1 omitted) using the Defendant’s cell phone at the ○○ Real Estate Office in Sigsan-si (hereinafter omitted) in Sigsan-si (hereinafter omitted) around June 12, 2009, that the Defendant would not purchase the Defendant’s forest land at 150 square meters (number 1 omitted) in the Gosung-gun-gun, Gosung-gun, Gosung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, the Defendant would offer good prospect for the purchase and sale of the Defendant. On June 12, 2009, the Defendant sent a text message to the victim’s mobile phone (number 1 omitted) using the Defendant’s cell phone at the ○○ Real Estate Office in Sigsan-si (hereinafter omitted), so that the victims may repeatedly send the text message to the victims through an information and communications network (number 2 omitted).

[209 High Court Decision 748]

1. Violation of Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection against Nonindicted 3

피고인은, 2009. 9. 6. 19:03경 통영시 광도면 죽림리에 있는 □□ 업주인 피해자 공소외 3(여, 33세)이 피고인에게 위 □□의 매매를 부탁하였다가 다시 취소하여 서로 말다툼을 한 사실이 있는데, 이에 대해 피해자의 친언니인 공소외 4가 전화를 하여 피고인에게 욕설을 하였다는 이유로 피고인의 휴대전화를 이용하여 위 피해자의 휴대전화( 번호 3 생략)에 ‘어이 잔챙이상대 재수업으니깐 조은말할 때 꺼져라 경찰 ㅋ 할짓 좆나 없나 당장 고소해라 어이 차라리 건달 대리온나 재수없는년들 재수없다 안냐’라는 문자를 전송하는 등 별지 범죄일람표(2) 순번 1, 2 기재와 같이 2회에 걸쳐 불안감을 유발하는 문자를 피해자에게 전송하고,

2. Violation of Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection against Nonindicted 4

피고인은 2009. 9. 6. 20:21경 위 나.항과 같은 이유로 피해자 공소외 4(여, 34세)의 휴대전화( 번호 4 생략)에 ‘심심해 목구명 쑤시고 싶음 계속 씹지랄떨어라 양치낄낄이붙어산다하더만불쌍한 싸구리씹년들 재수없어 꺼져 안냐 씹년아“라는 문자를 전송하는 등 별지 범죄일람표Ⅱ 순번 3 내지 7 기재와 같이 5회에 걸쳐 불안감을 유발하는 문자를 피해자에게 전송하였다.

[209 High Court Decision 757]

As above, when the Defendant sent text messages that cause uneasiness to the victim Nonindicted 3 and 4’s cell phones, there was a dispute between the victim and the victim. On September 7, 2009, around 10:0, the Defendant ○○ Real Estate used ○○○ to scam 4 (Inscam, 34 years old) and then scam the victim’s scam, and then scam the victim’s scam by hand, and scam the part of Nonindicted 3 (Inscam, 33 years old) of the victim’s scam, and scam Nonindicted 4 used the victim’s scam for treatment for about two weeks, and assaulted Nonindicted 3.

[Attachment 2010, 134]

At around 1:40 on September 2, 2009, the Defendant: (a) followed the victim Nonindicted 7 (year 59) who was the lessor of the above building, prior to the bankruptcy, in accordance with the construction for the completion of the water leakage of the above ○○ Real Estate, and caused a dispute between the victim and the victim; (b) provided the victim with the desire to “YY Y Y Y Y Y Y Y YY Y YY Y YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YYY YY YY

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each testimony of Nonindicted 1, 4, 3, and 7

1. Statement of the police statement against Nonindicted 2 and 8

1. Photographs photographs of text messages from each mobile phone;

1. The real estate brokerage office registration ledger;

1. Notification of matters concerning reporting on closure of real estate brokerage business;

1. A criminal report accompanied by a regular scam photograph;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

Application of Statutes

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

Articles 48 subparag. 1 and 9(1) of the Business Affairs of Licensed Real Estate Agents and Report of Real Estate Transactions Act, each Criminal Act Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 74(1)3 and 44-7(1)3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., and Selection of each fine

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Detention in a workhouse;

Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

[Attachment]

Judges Song Bo-young