If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

No one shall use or benefit from administrative property without following the procedures and methods prescribed by Acts and subordinate statutes, and illegally occupy or use agricultural infrastructure without justifiable grounds.

Nevertheless, from around 1998 to July 15, 2013, the Defendant installed cement block and roof on a ditch, which is an administrative property and agricultural infrastructure located in Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do, and used 10 square meters in the ditch site as part of a house, and installed sperm in the same ditch located in C in the same year, and used 4 square meters in the ditch site as a warehouse.

Accordingly, the defendant used and profit from administrative property in violation of the laws and regulations and illegally used agricultural infrastructure without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A written accusation;

1. Survey result map of the cadastral status;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Investigation report (a copy of the register of land occupied and used by a suspect);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (report on confirmation of whether administrative property exists);

1. Relevant Articles 82, 7 (1) of the State Property Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 130 (3) and 18 (3) 3 of the Rearrangement of Agricultural and Fishing Villages Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (a punishment heavier than that prescribed by the State Property Act);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;