정보공개결정처분취소
2016Nu4750 Revocation of revocation of the decision to disclose information
Government Legal Service
The Minister of Environment
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2015Guhap10964 decided May 12, 2016
September 1, 2016
September 22, 2016
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The part concerning the information related to the Plaintiff among the information disclosure decision made by the Defendant on September 8, 2015 to September 1, 2015 with respect to "the appointment of an attorney of the Ministry of Environment from September 2012 to 2014" and the part concerning the information related to the Plaintiff among the information disclosure decision made by the Defendant on September 16, 2015 to September 16, 2015, including the Ministry of Environment attorney and advisory attorney-at-law, shall be revoked.
1. Quotation of the first instance judgment
The reasoning for the court’s explanation on the instant case is the same as that of the first instance judgment, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (the grounds asserted in the first instance court while filing an appeal by the plaintiff do not significantly differ from the contents asserted by the plaintiff in the first instance court, and even if all the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the first instance court are examined, the judgment rejecting the
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.
The presiding judge, judge and assistant judge;
Judges Cho Hun-tae
Judges Kim Gin-ran