(심리불속행) 사해행위 취소 및 금전지급청구[국승]
Seoul High Court-2013-Na-40218 ( January 13, 2017)
(C) Revocation of fraudulent act and demand for payment of money
(1) The part of the claim for revocation of a fraudulent act is unlawful, and it is not unlawful because it is not possible to specify the subject matter of lawsuit with the claimant who seeks payment of money or fulfillment of obligations.
Article 30 of the National Tax Collection Act
2017Da34882 Revocation of Fraudulent Act
aa
000
Seoul High Court-2013-Na-40218 ( January 13, 2017)
November 09, 2017
All appeals are dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the appointed parties, including the plaintiff (appointed parties).
Examining the judgment below and the grounds of appeal, since it is apparent that the appellant’s ground of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, all appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.