(b) Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes

2.(a)(b) C

Law Firm K (Attorneys GV, L, GW (for Defendants)

Law Firm GX (Attorney J) (for the Defendants),

Law Firm (LLC) GY (Attorneys GZ, HA, and HB) (Defendant B)

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have convicted the Defendants of all the ancillary charges regarding taking the Defendants in breach of trust on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on co-principals,

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Lee In-bok

Justices Kim Gin-young

Justices Lee Ki-taik