Defendant

A is the actual operator of “G” in Ansan-si F, Defendant B is the representative in the name of G, Defendant C is the spouse of Defendant A, and Defendant D are the colon of Defendant A. Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D sell miscellaneous products in “G” with Defendant A.

1. A person who violates the Agricultural Products Quality Control Act was prohibited from falsely marking the country of origin or making an indication likely to confuse the country of origin, but the Defendant A, B, and D conspired to sell the country of origin by falsely transferring the imported shoulder to a pans marked as a domestic product. On January 30, 2010, the Defendant A, B, and D mixed the domestic shoulder to the shoulder of the Republic of Korea at “G”, or sells the shoulder 4,510km, which indicated the country of origin as if he was a domestic shoulder, with the total of KRW 64,493,00,00 and KRW 14,30,000, and sold the shoulder 4,510 g, which indicated the country of origin as if he were a shoulder in Korea, and then sold it to I who operated H, with the total of KRW 30,300,00,00 in Korea, from around that time to June 21, 2010.

Accordingly, Defendant A, B, and D conspired to make a false indication of origin.

2. A person who violates the Act on the Labeling of Origin of Agricultural and Fishery Products was prohibited from committing an act of falsely marking the country of origin or making an indication that is likely to cause confusion with the country of origin, but the Defendants were ambiguous to sell the country of origin by falsely transferring the import shoulder to the spawn marked domestically. On January 8, 2013, the Defendants sold 3,00 g of the 3,000 g of the 14,000 g of the 14,000 g of the country of origin to I operating “H” by mixing the domestic shoulder in “G” with the domestic shoulder, or by mixing the domestic shoulder in whole, domestic production.

. include this.